Infant outcomes following midtrimester emergency cerclage in the presence of fully dilated cervix and prolapsing amniotic membranes into the vagina


Akkurt M. O., Yavuz A., SEZİK M., ÖZKAYA M. O.

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, cilt.29, sa.15, ss.2437-2441, 2016 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 29 Sayı: 15
  • Basım Tarihi: 2016
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1087495
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.2437-2441
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Cerebral palsy, emergency cerclage, neurodevelopmental outcome, preterm birth, rescue cerclage, PRETERM LABOR, CEREBRAL-PALSY, PREGNANCY, 2ND-TRIMESTER, INFECTION, COHORT, BIRTH
  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: To investigate the morbidity of infants, whose delivery was prolonged by an emergency cervical cerclage (EC).Methods: Ante- and postnatal data on subsequent EC procedures performed between 14 and 28 weeks of gestation for advanced cervical dilatation with prolapsing of amniotic membranes at a single institution within a 5-year-period were retrieved.Results: We identified 21 fetuses from 18 pregnancies. Median gestational age [interquartile range, IQR] at EC and prolongation of pregnancy was 21.5 [15-26] weeks and 49.3 [24-92] days, respectively. There were 4 (19%) stillbirths, 3 (14%) neonatal deaths, and 1 (5%) infant death. Ten infants (59% of livebirths) were admitted to neonatal intensive care unit and hospitalized for a median period of 11 [6-66] d. Of the surviving fetuses (14/21, 66.7%), 9 (42.8%) were intact, whereas 3 (17.6% of livebirths) had cerebral palsy (CP), 1 was diagnosed with hypothyroidism, and another had growth failure at 12 months of follow-up.Conclusion: EC seems to be beneficial only in a subset of pregnancies presenting with full cervical dilatation accompanied by prolapsing amniotic membranes into the vagina, and there is a requirement for more objective selection criteria. Neonatal morbidity, especially neurodevelopmental disability should be discussed thoroughly prior to this procedure.